The Naming Data · Chart 2 of 6

The rise of the invented word

The same taxonomy, sampled at three points across seventy years — the twenty largest American companies in 1955, 1994, and today — each counted under the name it actually used at the time. What dominated the first Fortune list has nearly vanished from the latest one.

Name Type Mix Over Time

Share of each era's top 20, by name type. Hover any segment for the share and the companies in it.

Name type mix in 1955, 1994 and 2025.

Reading the chart

The invented word went from non-existent to dominant.

In 1955 not one of the twenty largest companies had a made-up name — they were Standard Oils and Steels and family surnames. By 1994 a third of the top twenty were invented or coined words (Exxon, Mobil, Amoco, Texaco), the residue of the great oil-and-tobacco renaming wave. Abstract and invented names remain the single largest category today.

Description and geography quietly collapsed.

Literally descriptive names fell from 35% of the 1955 leaders to 10% today; geographic names — Gulf Oil, Bethlehem Steel, The Texas Company — fell from 15% to almost nothing. As companies outgrew a single product or region, the names that pinned them to one quietly disappeared.

Founder names faded last, and the new categories are tech's.

Founder names held at 35% through 1994 before finally halving. What replaced them are the shapes of the software era: blended portmanteaus (Microsoft, Costco, Elevance) and owned common nouns (Apple, Alphabet) — categories that barely existed at the top in the steel-and-oil decades.

Method & caveats

Each column is the top 20 of the Fortune list for that year — 1955 (the first list ever published), 1994 (the year Fortune added service companies), and the 2025–2026 ranking. Every company is counted under the name it used that year: the archive lists 1955's number two as "Exxon Mobil," but in 1955 it was Standard Oil of New Jersey, and it is classified as such here. These era corrections are what let the chart measure naming fashion rather than the archive's own relabeling.

Twenty companies per era is a small, top-heavy sample biased toward heavy industry in the early decades — so read this as the direction and magnitude of a shift, not a precise census. Source data and the full company-by-company classification live in names-dataset.json.